Mosaic Mennonites

Missional - Intercultural - Formational

Articles

Surrendering Our Desires, Becoming Fully Mosaic

by

by Danilo Sanchez

September 14 was the start of the series of the 2024 delegate preparation meetings for Assembly delegates to have conversations regarding Mosaic’s Strategic Plan, Pathways Recommendation on Affiliation, and learn about the Vibrant Mosaic Program. Prior to and in these meetings there is a lot of information to absorb.  

In working with our consultant, Grovider, the Pathways Steering Team (PST) created a strategic plan that would guide the work of Mosaic for the next three years. The strategic plan was borne out of the listening tour and Grovider compiled the data from that listening and gave the PST five clear themes which we used to develop the Pillar Statements for the Strategic Plan. Those five pillars are Reconciliation, Relationship Building, Clarity and Identity, Leadership Development, and Communication.  

The PST devoted several months to crafting objectives and activities aligned with them. It was hard to imagine what Mosaic could look like in three years and what was necessary to reach those goals. We recognized that as a conference we are conflict avoidant, so we listed activities that support communication and conflict resolution skills. For clarity and identity, we devised ways to live into our three priorities and help everyone in the conference understand them. We wanted to move the conference to a more “centered-set” model rather than a “bounded-set,” so we included reviewing our conference documents and statements. For leadership development, we included elements of the Vibrant Mosaic Program, trusting that we would receive grant funding to do so.  

Our hardest work was on the recommendation for affiliation. We spent a lot of time hearing from one another and discerning together. Ultimately, we decided “partnership, rather than membership” was the best approach for affiliation with MC USA. As stated in the rationale, our recommendation gives space for those who disagree to covenant as one body, while maintaining some level of relationship. Some congregations in Mosaic want to remove themselves from MC USA because of the Repentance and Transformation Resolution, while others affirmed the resolution and are excited about being members of MC USA. As a newly reconciled conference, it felt most important to figure out how to live into our name “Mosaic” and find space for each of those groups to belong.  

Another dynamic in our recommendation is that as Mosaic has worked at its missional and formational priorities, new global, Spirit-led relationships have emerged naturally. Mosaic Conference has a history of being experimental and entrepreneurial. Being a member of MC USA has posed a challenge to us that limits establishing those new relationships. As members, we would not be able to credential those leaders or have those communities join our conference. Being a partner with MC USA would let us live out our priorities and form deeper local and global relationships. 

I recognize that being on the PST has allowed me to process this recommendation and my emotions about it before others in the conference. I entered this process wanting very strongly to remain members of MC USA. I was going to fight for it. I value the relationships, networking, and resources the denomination provides. I have positive memories of attending various events and Convention.  

My stance changed during this process as I learned to practice “holy indifference” which calls us to set aside our own will and desired outcome and allow the Holy Spirit to transform in ways we need to be transformed. I heard concerns from affirming pastors and traditional pastors about the direction of our conference and how we should affiliate with MC USA. On the PST, I had to wrestle with different viewpoints and concerns of my teammates. In the end, the Holy Spirit took over the Pathways process. We all surrendered our desired outcomes to discern what was best for us as a conference and our pathway forward.   

We are excited about the strategic plan and how it will transform us as a conference. We are excited about the Vibrant Mosaic Program and the new opportunities it will create. And we are hopeful about the recommendation that it will shape new models for relating in institutions and allow us to be fully Mosaic. 

Danilo Sanchez

Danilo Sanchez is the Leadership Minister for Intercultural Transformation for Mosaic Conference. Danilo Sanchez lives in Allentown with his wife Mary and two daughters. He is a pastor at Ripple and leads in the areas of leadership development, discipleship, and teaching. Danilo also works part-time with the housing program of Ripple Community Inc as the Community Life Director.

A Congregant and Her Pastor Dialogue About Pathways

by

By Brenda Shelly and Jeff Wright

With permission, Mosaic News is reprinting an email dialogue that took place shortly after the Mosaic Board affirmed the Pathways Team’s recommendation for partnership, rather than membership, with MC USA.  

Subject: A question 

I guess I don’t have a clear understanding of what denominational membership “does” for a conference or a church. Other than the feeling of belonging to something larger (which makes me a little nostalgic and wistful when I recall the many impactful weeks I spent at conventions shepherding teens as a sponsor or being part of an uncomfortable table of strangers in delegate sessions who somehow become sweet friends by the end of the third day of forced conversation).  

Can you define for me exactly what would change if Mosaic became a partner with MC USA rather than a member? What is lost? What is gained?  

I feel like I understand the third way approach. How could we do anything else in this situation without amputating limbs from this body we call the church? If only all our anatomical parts would agree which direction to walk, right?  

-Brenda Shelly (Blooming Glen [PA] Mennonite)  

Subject: Re: A question

Brenda: 

I appreciate being asked this question, and particularly appreciate how it has been asked.  You have a wonderful spirit, getting to tough issues with tender care. Thanks. 

I was a participant in the efforts to bring the Mennonite Church and the General Conference Mennonite Church (which had a strong Canadian contingent and numerically bigger and more spread-out U.S. contingent) together into a binational merger. In the early days (1989-1997), we wanted three church bodies to become one. Unfortunately, Revenue Canada and by their own admission, the Canadian Mennonite leadership in Winnipeg, did not agree with that vision, and so by 1999 the three bodies began to become two national churches. “Amputation” was part of the organizational solution when merger took place in 2001. Even then, there were those of us serving on General Boards who found the language of “realignment” more descriptive and meaningful than “integration” or “merger.”   

Amid this realignment as national churches, there also began almost immediately realignment of local congregations from one conference to another. Churches withdrew from Ohio Conference and Indiana-Michigan Conference to join Central District Conference. The Iowa-Nebraska Conference and the Northern District Conference realigned as Central Plains Conference. The churches on the West Coast in three conferences had already merged into two conferences in 1994. Churches in various smaller conferences in the deep south, the Great Lakes, Maryland, and New York realigned with what we then knew as Lancaster Mennonite Conference (which was as early as 1971 ambivalent about connecting with other Mennonites in a denominational system). The Puerto Rican Mennonite Conference ultimately decided not to participate in this realignment as a part of the MC USA system. Other churches, in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Oklahoma, Missouri, and Florida joined more “conservative” Mennonite Conference or became independent. So, the realignment process was always a bit shaky, as congregations in both the former GCMC system and the former MC system struggled to navigate a new denomination that was chronically underfunded from day one. 

On your question of purpose, I would say that MC USA has been unable to provide the value of large conventions for over a decade. Issues of cost, demographics, and purpose for denominational conventions have been in flux for several convention cycles. What I think a denominational body can do today is pool limited resources for efforts that require a larger, deeper scope of work. Hymnals, curriculum, commentaries, missionaries, primary, secondary, and higher education, and other projects are examples of that which require collaboration and pooled investment.  

As for the question of change, I would begin by saying exactitude isn’t as possible as one might hope. One thing that is lost is Mosaic Conference’s place at the MC USA decision-making table. One thing that is likely gained is the capacity and the mandate to cultivate a global community of local congregations and ministries with a different freedom to respond to diverse contexts relationally and effectively. Where this might take us is not yet fully known, but the current status quo is not effective for enhancing a global community of local congregations and ministries. 

Personally, I think the church press is focused on compromise and human sexuality – as if these issues are somehow new. In the 2019 merger of Eastern District and Franconia, which gave birth to Mosaic, we knew the question of affiliation would need to be addressed – but then COVID hit. While LGBTQIA+ inclusion is an issue, it is not the singular driver of this conversation.  

I don’t believe that Mosaic is seeking to create more schism and division. It is useful for me to remember that the New Testament has various metaphors for the church; the body image is one of several. In the case of Mosaic, I think we are seeking to be a more grown-up part of the household of faith, able and willing to respond to things unique to our experience. 

I look to Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) or Everence as future models of Mosaic Mennonite Conference and its potential relationship to MC USA. There are significant differences within MCC’s constituency about women in ministry, divorce, LGBTQIA+ inclusion, the scope of the peace witness, and more. Yet somehow, MCC finds ways for disparate groups of Mennonites to do relief, development, and peacebuilding in the name of Christ. I can foresee Mosaic Conference working with MC USA…and LMC, Brethren in Christ, and the even the Mennonite Brethren and plain Mennonite communities to do good in the world, collaborating with agencies like MennoMedia, Mennonite Mission Network, Eastern Mennonite Mission, Virginia Mennonite Mission…and Mennonite World Conference (maybe especially MWC). 

What is being proposed, in my opinion, is not a severing of relationships, but a continued adaptation and realignment. Speaking personally, I think MC USA will find itself returning to a more General Conference Mennonite Church polity point: dual membership. If I can be forgiven some prognostication, I think MC USA will ultimately be membered by local congregations, not area conferences. Local congregations may (or may not) be members of MC USA, and by separate action may (or may not) be members of a specific conference. Being a member of one might provide an access point to collaboration, but not necessarily to specific assemblies of decision-makers. 

I hope I haven’t wandered in the tall weeds too much. My reply comes to you as a pastor and in no way seeks to speak for Mosaic Conference. As it might be said: “The opinions expressed in this email are the opinions of the author alone, and does not represent Mosaic Conference, MC USA, or Blooming Glen Mennonite in any official capacity, and are subject to change without notice.” 

Thanks again, Brenda, for asking.

-Jeff Wright

Ministerial Committee Update – September 2024

by

The Ministerial Committee makes decisions on ministry credentials and policies that promote the support, health, and training of credentialed leaders and safe church practices for congregations. They meet quarterly to act on recommendations from the credentialing committee, review and revise current policies around credentialed leaders, and provide leadership in cases of misconduct.   

Report from the September 4, 2024 Ministerial Committee Meeting

Credentialing Updates and Motions

Ordination

  • Effiem Obasi (LA [CA] Faith Chapel)
  • Emmanuel Villatoro (Philadelphia [PA] Praise Center)

Withdrawn

License Extension

  • Benjamin Toussaint (Solidarity and Harmony [Philadelphia, PA])

Active without Charge to Active

  • Samuel Charles (Bethel Worship and Teaching Center [Levittown, PA]) 
  • Tim Weaver – Mosaic Leadership Minister
Other Ministerial Committee Updates

Hearing from Beth Yoder (Salford [PA]) about her Giving and Receiving Counsel Process

Giving and Receiving Counsel Policy Update – adding steps for after committee determination

Misconduct Policy Review – for situations of conflict of interest and enmeshment

Credentialing Renewal Update – approximately half of credentialed leaders have successfully renewed their credentials

Credentialing Process Alternative Questionnaire will be tested with Partner in Ministry leaders outside of the United States.

Definitions Related to Credentials:  

  • Licensed for Specific Ministry (LSM) – Person called from within the congregation to serve in a specific leadership assignment within the congregation or another organization  
  • Licensed toward Ordination (LTO) – Issued for a three-year period with the purpose of testing the inner and outer call to ministry, further discerning of ministerial gifts, abilities, and aptitude; may or may not lead to ordination.  
  • License Extension – A three year-extension is given to a person in active ministry who has a license towards ordination but is not ready for ordination. 
  • Ordination (ORD) – Long-term leadership ministry credential appropriate for all pastors, area conference ministry staff, chaplains, missionaries, evangelists, and those determined by the church to have a continuing ministerial-leadership role in and on behalf of the church.  

Status Definitions

  • Active – held by those serving in a leadership-ministry assignment. 
  • Active without Charge – held by those not presently holding a ministry assignment.  
  • Inactive – held by those who have been without a ministerial assignment for more than three consecutive years.  
  • Retired – held by those who have retired from active ministry.  
  • Withdrawn – is given when a ministry credential is ended for non-disciplinary reasons. 

Get Ready for Mosaic Mennonite Conference Assembly 

by

Saturday, November 2, 2024: 9 AM-4:30 PM  

Registration for delegates will take place from 8:30-9 AM

Souderton Mennonite Church (map) 
105 W Chestnut St., Souderton, PA 18964  
(in person – there is no virtual option this year) 

Delegate Registration 

All delegates named by their congregations should have received an email on September 3, 2024, explaining the day-of onsite delegate registration process.  

If you are attending Assembly as a guest (all non-delegates), you are most welcome.  To help us plan and prepare, please let us know by signing up here. RSVP for non-delegates opened on Tuesday, Sept. 3. Delegates were automatically signed up when their congregation named them.

Sue Conrad Howes, former Editor of Mosaic News, has returned as Mosaic Assembly’s Registrar. 

If you are coming from a distance, plan your travel and arrange for your lodging.  If you need assistance with lodging, please click here for information. 

Please pray for the Assembly, Mosaic’s Board, delegates, the Mosaic staff planning it, those attending, and God’s leading in the process.

Delegate Preparation Meetings

What are Assembly Delegate Preparation Meetings? 
Mosaic Conference holds a series of delegate preparation meetings in the weeks leading up to our gathered Assembly. The purpose of these meetings is to help delegates understand the important commitment and specific duties they are responsible for, to prepare them with the latest information on the issues that will be discussed, and to give an opportunity to give feedback and ask questions. 

Delegates are asked to please attend at least one meeting on a date & location that best suits them.  Let us know what meeting you are attending so we can plan.

Guests are welcome to attend these meetings.  

The 2024 Docket will be released in early October and emailed to delegates.

Visit MosaicMennonites.org/assembly for more information.  

Where Do We Go From Here?

by

by Stephen Kriss

My last vote as a Franconia Conference delegate was to reconcile with Eastern District Conference in 2019. After years of process and negotiation, a 150-year-old schism was reconciled. It was joyous and hopeful. There were tears and senses of finally. It was the fruit of long processes, listening, and laboring. It included a carefully constructed formation document that was designed to bring as many of us between the two conferences into relationship as seemed possible at the time. While this was happening in fall 2019, we expected those in Southeast Conference that wanted to remain in fellowship with Mennonite Church USA (MC USA) to join us in fall 2020. 

No one could have predicted that our Eastern District/Franconia Conference reconciliation process would be impaled by a pandemic and months of social unrest, including protests related to George Floyd’s murder and an uprising at the U.S. Capitol during a presidential transition. Our increased social isolation and polarization came to the surface as anger and frustration.  While many U.S. cities were experiencing protest, we took on the new hopeful name Mosaic. We believed that a new identity was necessary to move forward and find our way together. 

There were already some challenging points in our formation document. The question of affiliation with MC USA was raised, but as both Eastern District and Franconia were members, the team deferred it. There was conversation about switching our basic belief document from the Confession of Faith in a Mennonite Perspective from 1995 to the Seven Core Convictions of Mennonite World Conference. At the time, that would have put us outside the boundaries MC USA had formed. And there were already tensions around the inclusion of queer people, with some of us needing the Grace and Truth and Going to the Margins statements, and others seeing this as a time for revision. We took the most conservative route and held onto all the documents and positions already in play, deciding that a new organizational system didn’t need that challenge yet. 

After our historic, joyous vote to reconcile, we had two online annual assemblies due to Covid concerns. We didn’t meet face-to-face again until after a special delegate session of MC USA in summer 2022. Some of us came to the 2022 Mosaic assembly with heated concerns about its process and outcome, particularly related to the passing of the Repentance and Transformation Resolution. There was a mosaic of opinions and responses, with rumors of schism already. In response to issues around human sexuality, Mosaic lost five member congregations and delegates allowed an opt-out of MC USA, which another seven congregations took. We focused on hesed, extending loving-kindness. We tackled a two-year process of Pathways to help us find our way together. 

In teaching about Anabaptism, I’ve come to love Walter Klassen’s work Anabaptism: Neither Catholic nor Protestant. His later addition would be that we are “both/and.” We have much in common with the Protestant movement and its fracturing ways. We have much in common with the orders of Catholicism in their orientations to distinct practices. As someone shaped by Catholic background and education along with Mennonite education and practices, I’ve tried to find a way for us to live in the in-between of this reality. Martin Buber, a Jewish philosopher/theologian, calls it the “narrow ridge.” 

The narrow ridge is precarious. Finding a pathway that is solid enough for us all to move ahead together while admitting the precarious and difficult terrain takes wisdom, willingness, and work. Moving forward with a recommendation as bold and complicated as a redefined relationship with our denomination will require elements of hesed, and another word that we used to know well from German, gelassenheit or yieldedness. 

The Pathways Team’s recommendation will require something of us. It is easy to define relationships as “in/out” or “right/wrong.” Sometimes relationships change because of organic growth. And for many of us, change is difficult. 

The recommended shift to partnership rather than membership gives Mosaic the space that we need to navigate the narrow ridge. We will need to commit to working in ways that are collaborative more than hierarchal, local/global rather than national/colonial, and relational rather than institutional. This creates space for growth and allows us space to further discern our identity as Mosaic Mennonites in a world that desperately needs the reconciling love of Jesus. 

Of course there is irony in all of this. And pain. And all kinds of emotions. I trust the work of the Spirit to use this moment regardless of the outcomes. Through our history, we have been entrusted with a peaceable and often fracturing way of following Jesus. We are like the world around us, both broken and beautiful. We are full of hope and possibility and desperately in need of mercy and grace. 

Author’s Note: Our conference communities have been in flux of relationships for years. 

  • Franconia Conference joined the General Assembly of the Mennonite Church in the early 1970s. Before that it operated autonomously in collaboration with other conferences (though rarely until recently with Eastern District).
  • Eastern District joined a group of mostly Midwest congregations to form the General Conference Mennonite Church after the split from Franconia in 1847.
  • Southeast Conference formed from the amalgamation of congregations from a variety of Conferences in Florida and Georgia in 1967 which then broke apart as it joined LMC following a 2018 vote. Several congregations from California joined Franconia/Mosaic over the last decade after exiting Pacific Southwest Mennonite Conference.

Stephen Kriss

Stephen Kriss is the Executive Minister of Mosaic Conference.

Creation is Calling for Peace

by

by Joyce Munro

immersive and collaborative 

An art installation of 12 Mosaic Conference artists suggests its theme: “Creation is Calling for Peace.” It is on display until September 28 at the Conference-Related Ministry Mennonite Heritage Center (Harleysville, PA), along with paintings and worship sanctuary art by Berdine Leinbach (Souderton [PA] congregation).  

Ever since she visited Wonderspaces in Austin, TX, Leinbach has wanted to create an interactive multi-sensory art experience. How could she do that for her upcoming 2024 show at the Mennonite Heritage Center? In the Lapp gallery? 

Ouisi, a game of associations, has a nature version that invites players to find patterns. “Everyone can notice, wonder, and connect,” Leinbach says about this game. The show idea grew to include the game, as well as an I-spy element.  

Another question for Leinbach was: Could artists together create something around a creation theme?  

The Interdependence Hexagon Project, an arts and educators collective based in Scranton, PA, uses this geometric shape to focus its makers on relationships that can be made visible and practiced in a world where shared values are needed if we are to survive.  

Joy and Connection. These were Leinbach’s longings for the anticipated show. There it was—a hexagon project for Mosaic artists. With six equal sides to connect to other hexagons!  

Leinbach offered each artist three or more wooden hexagons in Fall 2023, which were returned to her by each artist in Spring 2024.

“Berdine asked if I’d be willing to collaborate in this project. I agreed without hesitation,” writes Ramona Pickett (7 Ways Home Fellowship), a liturgical dancer and life coach living in Maryland, with whom Berdine first brainstormed the project.  

Leinbach and Pickett had worked together on the intercultural planning team for the October 2022 Mosaic Women’s Gathering. “I knew she was full of ideas and her creative outlet was dance and sewing,” Leinbach says. They brainstormed other artists they knew.  

“Carla Garder was the first person who popped into my brain,” Ramona says. Carla and she worship together with 7 Ways Home Fellowship. So the project got a crochet enthusiast.  

Glenn Bauman, Joanna Rosenberger, Kim Bergey, Libby Musselman, Lydia Sensenig, Mandy Martin, Tim Swartz, and Vicki Beyer were also on board.  

So was Steve, Berdine’s husband and a graphic artist whose skills would be needed when it came to building a visual key for the installation with statements from the artists. 

When the hexagons came back from the artists five months later, Berdine saw that no mammals were included (think Edward Hicks’ “The Peaceable Kingdom”). Steve searched through his photos. A lion, elephant, and a leopard made hexagonal entrances. 

fusion, sometimes drama 

Many individual hexagons speak for themselves:  

Dramatic three-dimensional blues and white swirl on Vicki Beyer’s hexagons, sometimes in interlocking patterns. There’s tension and action here.

Poppies like shooting red and white stars pop—these are the flowers of Flanders and war; the artist Mandy Martin reminds viewers—not simply a signature subject of hers.  

Subtle green tones and patterns occur in the quilted fabrics of Pickett’s earth hexagon; a gold button for the precious metal that Proverbs signifies is the result of purification provides continuity among her three hexagons. 

A child looks at you, its brow furrowed, so that peering at the installation, you cannot help but feel that a trauma has occurred and you are here to wait for its voicing.  

counterpoint 

Several hexagons benefit from their placement among others: 

A crescent moon among distant stars situates questions that night skies prompt, that religions seek to answer. . . abuts Fraktur symbols of Mennonite piety in Kim Bergey’s hexagons. 

A grey so dark so close you must make of the scene something that’s almost terrifyingly your own meaning, even though your brain scrambles to categorize the image calmly. . . It is the breakdown of life carbon and mineral that up close is a sandy shore on a cloudy day. Tim Swartz attends to the turmoil narrative of creative process while finding calm in the patterns that happen where land and water meet. 

I left the art installation feeling its silences:  

the tiny pollinators that get mistakenly called “bees,”  

unseen, the billions in a tablespoon of healthy soil and their absence in unhealthy soil,  

the vulture gut and its glorious work, 

edible oyster fungi growing on dead ash trees,  

invisible methane escaping confined meat animals. . . 

Then there is the vanilla bean that we are about to lose because of climate change. 

What are life changes we could make if we would hear these creations calling for peace?  

The collaborative work by Mosaic artists, along with many other of Leinbach’s paintings, are available for viewing at the Mennonite Heritage Center until Sept. 28, 2024. 

A photo of this collaborative work was selected by the Hexagon Project’s Posters for Peace exhibit beginning at ArtWorks Gallery and Studio in Scranton from Sept 6-21. It is one of 40 selections out of 1,500 entries.  

If your congregation or Conference-Related Ministry is interested in displaying the piece after the exhibit, please let Berdine Leinbach know.  

Mosaic congregations and Conference-Related Ministries represented include Souderton Mennonite, Dock Mennonite Academy, Ambler [PA], Blooming Glen [PA] Mennonite, 7 Ways Home Fellowship, and Salford (Harleysville, PA) Mennonite. 

Joyce Munro

Joyce Munro is a member of Unami Friends Meeting and involved with the Carbon Forest Project. She is also a volunteer for the Mennonite Heritage Center (Harleysville, PA).

MCC Summer Service Workers We’re Learning From

by

by Jennifer Svetlik

In addition to hosting nine Mosaic summer Ambassadors, three other young people within Mosaic congregations participated in the MCC summer service program, a 10-week program for young adults of color in the U.S. that runs from June to August. The program encourages and strengthens leadership capabilities within young adults while nurturing a commitment to community engagement.  

Game time with the Peace Camp children.

Cheryne Yapcolin is a part of Philadelphia Praise Center. She applied for MCC summer service to expand her understanding of community service and to integrate her passion for worship with meaningful outreach. She also wanted to learn from new experiences and to see how she could contribute to her community according to her abilities.  

During the program, Yapcolin lead worship, organized community events, and supported the summer Peace Camp for the kids aged 7 to 11 years old, the youth retreat, and the Indonesian night market.  

“Balancing multiple responsibilities was quite challenging. Managing my time between work, personal matters, and ministry duties required a lot of organization,” reflects Yapcolin.  

She was surprised by the strong sense of community and support from members of her congregation and the MCC team. “This summer experience also showed me that people from different nations, races, cultures and backgrounds can understand and care for each other,” she says.  

When reflecting on her learnings from the summer, Yapcolin offered, “Leadership is about empathy, active listening, and empowering others to bring out the best in themselves. Leading with compassion and understanding helps build stronger teams and creates a welcoming community.” 

Lioe pictured in the front of the worship band. 

\

Victoria Lioe is a part of Indonesian Light Church (Philadelphia, PA). She applied for Summer Service because she loves to contribute to her congregation and wanted to be able to do it more. 

Some of her projects this summer included leading worship, multimedia work, organizing events and leading the youth group. Each of these responsibilities allowed her to develop a diverse set of skills and contribute meaningfully to the community. 

She found spending time with the youth group especially rewarding, particularly when they shared funny stories about their lives and asked her for advice.  

“Summer service offered an excellent opportunity for personal growth and leadership development,” Lioe shared. “It allowed me to connect with like-minded individuals who share my values and beliefs, fostering both professional and personal relationships.” 

One of her learnings was “that my fears about potential outcomes can impact my effectiveness as a leader, creating barriers that hinder my performance,” she reflects. “I developed better multitasking abilities and learned the importance of addressing stress and anxiety while embracing challenges as opportunities for growth.” 

Lioe will continue to support her congregation this fall including in their annual retreat and with performances from the youth.  

This summer, Chile oversaw LA Faith Chapel’s clothes distribution.

George Chile is a part of LA (CA) Faith Chapel. He applied for Summer Service to expand his capabilities and be more productive and impactful. He had heard stories about MCC’s work and was eager to learn from the organization and apply it to his life, congregation, and community.  

Chile’s assignment for the summer was assistant organizer. He set up events but also was given ministry responsibilities. “I found myself doing things I never thought I would do. I went from seat warmer to getting involved in what it takes to run a church for a whole summer.” 

Chiles’ notion of responsibility and collective support was challenged when he was able to experience how many people came together to support one another and work on various tasks and events. The large outreach events and how they touched the broader community made an impression on him. 

“I was surprised by my ability to grow in focus and work collectively with others to get projects done,” Chiles reflects. He noted that growing in leadership takes time, but with a drive to serve God and touch people, anyone can make a difference. He was grateful for the opportunity to have new responsibilities and accountability.  

As he finishes his experience, Chiles is motivated to take risks and say yes to new experiences to learn and grow. “MCC provided me a space to nurture a Godly mindset and heart,” Chiles shares.  

Jennifer Svetlik

Jennifer is Editor & Development Coordinator for Mosaic. She grew up near Houston, TX and spent a decade living in intentional community in Washington DC, before moving to Lansdale, PA with her spouse, Sheldon Good. She is a graduate of the University of Texas and Washington Theological Seminary. She serves as Children’s Faith Formation Director at Salford Mennonite (Harleysville, PA). Jenn has two elementary-school-aged children and loves biking, camping, gardening, and vermicomposting with her family. 

A Pathway Doxology 

by

by Marta Castillo

“O, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God!  
How unsearchable his judgments, and his paths beyond tracing out!  
‘Who has known the mind of the Lord? Or who has been his counselor?’  
‘Who has ever given to God, that God should repay them?’  
For from him and through him and for him are all things.  
To him be the glory forever! Amen.”  

– Romans 11:33-36, NIV 

When our children are young, we limit their choices. We say, “Do you want the red cup or the yellow cup?” As their world expands, they realize that there are blue cups, green cups, and all kinds of cups to choose from. Having many choices can be lifegiving and can be overwhelming. 

When Mosaic’s Pathways Steering Team was charged with developing a strategic plan and bringing a recommendation of affiliation with MC USA, I went in with a two-path mentality. In Robert Frost’s poem “The Road Not Taken”, he suggests that there are two roads and that we can choose only one of them. The less-traveled road would lead to another, and it is unlikely we could go back. 

Pathway Process Steering Committee Members

  • Brandon Bergey – Bethany (Bridgewater Corners, VT)
  • Brent Camilleri – Deep Run East (Perkasie, PA)
  • Bronwyn Histand – Blooming Glen (PA)
  • Cherokee Webb – Faith Chapel (Los Angeles, CA)
  • Danilo Sanchez – Ripple (Allentown, PA), Mosaic Staff
  • Jenny Fujita – Upper Milford (Zionsville, PA)
  • Jim Musselman – Zion (Souderton, PA), Mosaic Board
  • Haroldo Nunes – Seguidores de Cristo (Sarasota, FL)
  • Kiron Mateti – Plains (Hatfield, PA)
  • Mark Reiff – Doylestown (PA)
  • Marta Castillo – Nueva Vida Norristown (PA) New Life, Mosaic Staff
  • Regina Valensia – Philadelphia (PA) Praise Center

Learn more

That may be true. However, when a group like our diverse Pathways Team works together, the choices of pathways become much more complex and roundabout. There are not just two paths but a city with miles of streets. It’s possible to turn right, left, or go around the block to return to the same place. There are some one-way streets we can’t enter, and we must go around the block and choose another way. 

Our team knew that finding a path forward would be difficult and would mean committing to God, one another, and the journey. We believed our desire to seek God’s will would please God, and that God would be faithful to show us the way. We kept saying to one another, “If our group can come to agreement on the way forward, then there is hope for the conference to come to agreement.” 

Our team was asked to focus first on the strategic plan and our identity as Mosaic, and then consider our recommendation for affiliation with MC USA. We were asked to consider but decenter the LGBTQIA conversation and instead center on our identity as a conference, our vision, mission, and priorities.  

The focus areas that emerged were clarity/identity, communication, relationship building, leadership development, and reconciliation. When we learned of the probability of receiving the Vibrant Mosaic Program grant, we incorporated those activities into the plan. Many of us felt excited about all that could happen over the next three years. 

After turning the strategic plan over to our consultants for refinement, we turned to discernment on our recommendation for affiliation with MC USA. It was a disconcerting moment, and we asked ourselves, “How do we decide? What process do we use?” 

We gathered information and had direct and deeper conversations with groups in Mosaic around the three options that had emerged – independence, renewed commitment, or partnership and collaboration. We considered the implications of each option.  

From our conversations, we heard that a split to independence was supported by only a few, a renewed commitment to MC USA was encouraged by a higher percentage, and the option to leave as a member but continue as a partner brought the most energy and felt mostly lifegiving by a wide margin. 

After processing the feedback, our last step was to discern and decide which recommendation we would make to the Board. In a meeting, each team member presented and explained their recommendation, from their own areas of influence and connections within the conference. There was a clear majority recommending collaboration and partnership, with several advocating for continued commitment, so we decided to take additional time for discernment.  

Two weeks later, we met and received a more detailed list of ways we might be able to collaborate with MC USA, and each team member again shared their recommendation. That evening we came to consensus to recommend collaboration and partnership with MC USA. 

For me, it was a joyful culmination of the work the Holy Spirit had done in our group. We had committed to each other and to the work, even in disagreements. Each person’s gifts were used, and each person remained engaged throughout the almost two-year process. The ebb and flow of the process showed us who we can be in community. Together we wrote our final recommendation and rationale. 

We offer it to you as a labor of love, representing many hours of prayer, conversation, and discernment. To the delegates, it is now your choice!  

“For from him and through him and for him are all things. To him be the glory forever! Amen.”

Romans 11:35, NIV

Marta Castillo

Marta Castillo is the Associate Executive Minister for Mosaic Conference. Marta lives in Norristown, PA, with her husband, Julio, and has three sons, Christian, Andres and Daniel and one granddaughter, Isabel.